Economic Concerns Driving DOJ's Prosecutorial Discretion in Large Corporate Prosecutions; Government Files Civil Suit Against Deutsche Bank Over Alleged Massive Mortgage Fraud

Federal officials last week announced that Deutsche Bank and its mortgage division, MortgageIT, allegedly engaged in fraud on a massive scale as a civil complaint was filed against Deutsche Bank. The complaint alleges that the massive German bank allegedly defrauded the government of up to $1.2 billion through alleged reckless lending practices. The Federal Housing Administration has allegedly paid out approximately $386 million in wrongful insurance claims. The government is seeking three times this amount in fines and penalties. Among the government's allegations is a charge that documents which would have informed bank officials about high rates of default were hidden in a closet at MortgageIT. The civil complaint fails to disclose any incriminating documents which could be used to establish an intent to defraud the government.

However, according to an article by Fox Business News, the government is holding back in the Deutsche Bank case from bringing criminal charges in response to the alleged massive fraud. The author points to the case as illustrative of a trend by Federal officials to prosecute alleged wrongdoing by corporations through civil, rather than criminal, means.

The article speculates that Federal officials might have elected civil, rather than criminal, proceedings due to the lower burden of proof , as well as the more time and resource-consuming nature of criminal proceedings. It also acknowledges concerns by prosecutors over potential harm to corporations, investors and the economy and markets in general, illustrated by the demise of accounting giant Arthur Andersen in 2002 as a result of the federal prosecution in the wake of the Enron scandal. The article cites the fact that criminal, as opposed to civil, actions, are often accompanied or followed by de-licensing actions by regulatory bodies.

The article also cites the relatively few criminal prosecutions following the financial collapse of 2007. What criminal proceedings there have been have focused on individuals with various Wall Street firms--rather than the firms themselves. Furthermore, several of these prosecutions have ended in failure, as exemplified by the acquittal of former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin in 2009.

Investment Advisor Jailed for Refusing to Locate Assets from $130 Million Alleged Investment Scheme

Trevor Cook was 37 year-old Minneapolis, Minnesota-based investment advisor. He is alleged to have defrauded investors of at least $130 million. U.S. District Judge Michael Davis found Cook in contempt of an order by the Court requiring Cook and his associates to turn in investor assets to a receiver, according to an article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Cook invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to questions regarding money, assets and offshore accounts. U.S. Marshals took Cook into custody yesterday. The Court ordered Cook to remain incarcerated until he cooperates with the receiver and surrenders monies and assets, including a houseboat and a submarine. Cook is also ordered to assist in the recovery of a computer and other records.

Cook pitched currency investments to investors. The alleged scheme was promoted by Cook and Pat Kiley in a widely broadcast radio program called "Follow the Money." Cook used a vast array of business entities and bank accounts to funnel monies from investors, including eight accounts in the U.S. and 19 foreign accounts in a dozen countries. The structuring of the transactions and the fact that some of the foreign accounts are in countries noted for being bank secrecy havens has made the monies difficult to locate. Cook has not yet been indicted.